🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are paid to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.